Company of Heroes 2 Review
Though fairly iterative, this strategy sequel offers a huge helping of content that mostly lives up to the series' lofty standards
Posted by Tim Reid (with_teeth26) on Jul 3, 2013 - 9:47pm EST (252 days ago)
When Company of Heroes burst onto the scene in 2006, it felt like a real time strategy game from the future. It had incredibly detailed visuals, fully destructible environments and a cover system for units that contributed to deep rock-paper-scissors gameplay which was designed in such a way that fighting was intense and continuous throughout both the excellent campaign and multiplayer components. Seven years later and Relic has finally released the sequel, and surprisingly little has changed. At a glance, the game might seem like a big expansion rather than a proper sequel. However, after playing the game it is safe to say that there are enough positive tweaks to the formula that help it feel like a different and ultimately better game which still retains the core design that made the original so compelling back in 2006.
Soviet conscripts double as meat shields in a pinch
The most obvious difference between Company of Heroes 1 and 2 is the setting. The first game followed the compelling but heavily used tale of American soldiers fighting through Europe immediately after D-day. The sequel takes place on the Eastern front, with the campaign following the invasion of Russia by the Germans in 1941 all the way to the eventual Soviet victory at Berlin four years later. The morally questionable tactics employed the Red Army are dealt with head on in the campaign, albeit in a rather ham-fisted way, and as a result you don't really feel like a hero as you send scores of men to their deaths in order to achieve victory. The lengthy campaign covers the entire conflict between the Germans and Russians, with the first set of missions involving frantically defending against the Nazi blitzkrieg. As the Russians eventually held the Germans back at Stalingrad and started pushing toward their borders in the war, the mission design changes as well.
Instead of telling the story of the conflict in a straightforward manner, a narrative framing device is used to dig into the morality of the war. The missions are played as flashbacks from an ex-Red Army officer who is being interrogated in a Gulag several years after the war. The brutality of the Red Army is dealt with in a rather hammy way thanks to cheesy Russian-accented voice acting and stiff facial animations rendered in a game engine designed for an isometric overhead view. This framework really doesn't add much to the game, but fortunately these cut scenes are brief and can be skipped, and the never interrupt the gameplay. The tale of the brutal conflict is compelling enough on its own, and missions are contextualized in this regard with a simple paragraph as each one loads.
The campaign contains fourteen missions overall, many of which lasting in excess of one hour if you attempt to complete bonus objectives. Most missions are multi-staged; you might start out having to gain a foothold in a town, then defend against a counterattack, then capture the remainder of the town. Many missions allow you to field large numbers of units, and frantically micro-managing so many different squads on multiple fronts can become a significant challenge. The endless stream of conscripts you can call in for these missions might tempt you to create a big ball of infantry, but this tactic will only get you so far as mortars and machine guns will halt your progress if you rely only on these troops. To help them out you can recruit specialized units that will allow you to destroy tanks and take out machine guns.
You'll have to warm your troops near fires when a blizzard hits
A handful of missions have you carefully controlling just a few squads, with the best of these taking place during the winter where you must hunt down a tiger tank with only a few limited anti-armor means at your disposal, making for a tense cat-and-mouse game. The winter weather effects are one of the new additions to Company of Heroes 2, although they are used in only a handful of missions during the campaign. When fighting in the winter, blizzards will periodically sweep through, and these bursts of snow and wind will freeze your troops to death unless you place them beside fires or inside buildings, at which point vehicles and cold-resistant snipers will rule the battlefield. There are also pockets of deep snow that will slow down troop movements and reveal footprints and vehicle tracks. Lakes and rivers freeze over, allowing for some opportunities to flank, although the ice can be destroyed using explosives and mortars, meaning you need to be very careful when maneuvering valuable tanks across these features lest they sink before seeing any action.
While winter weather is one of the most dramatic additions to the series, a number of tweaks have been made that improve the experience appreciably. Tanks now have a 'reverse gear' option which lets you control direction of movement, a small change that makes a big difference when you are trying to pull a tank out of a losing battle without exposing its weaker rear armor. Troops can now vault over low fences, an addition which players of the first Company of Heroes will likely appreciate greatly. During tank battles, it is possible for a tank crew to abandon the vehicle, allowing infantry from either side to commandeer and repair it. The way points are captured has also been altered; now there is a zone around each capture point, and to capture it you must move friendly troops into this zone while it is also clear of enemy forces. This allows combat to continue uninterrupted while points are being captured and further increases the intensity of the combat in both single and multiplayer battles.
Missions get more and more intricate later in the campaign
Apart from these relatively small alterations, the core gameplay from the first Company of Heroes remains intact. Troops must be placed in cover if they are to survive for long, armor can only be damaged using specific anti-armor weaponry and infantry will still get suppressed by machine gun fire. Buildings can be garrisoned and destroyed, and walls smashed through to open up new tactical opportunities. The rock-paper-scissors gameplay that was so compelling seven years ago remains very strong today, although unsurprisingly it doesn't feel quite as fresh and original.
If the singleplayer campaign doesn't quench your thirst for historically contextualized encounters, the new Theater of War mode offers up another set of co-op and solo scenarios for both the Soviets and the Germans. Some of these are basically just skirmishes against the AI in the developers' characteristic victory point control mode, where you must capture victory points to reduce the tickets of the opposing team to zero. The only difference between the normal skirmishes and Theater of War skirmishes are that you are only granted access to weaponry that existed during a certain year, with the game currently offering missions exclusively from 1941 (the following years will come in the future as DLC). Other missions are more interesting, and might involve defending against waves of attackers or destroying a certain number of buildings held by enemy forces. The Theater of War missions can be quite challenging compared to the campaign, with the German missions being conspicuously more difficult than the Soviet ones as many of the most powerful German units are not available in the 1941 time frame.